GHSA-f9j4-qggq-h239
GitPython Remote.pull() refspec bypasses the --upload-pack unsafe-option guard, enabling arbitrary command execution
- Risk score
- 64/100
- CVSS
- 8.1 v3.1
- Published
- 27 Oct 2026
Open in the live forecast Today's forecast
What to know
- What it is
- Remote.pull() in GitPython forwards its positional refspec argument directly to the git pull child process while its unsafe-option guard inspects only keyword arguments. An application that passes attacker-influenced data as the refspec (for example a user-supplied branch or refspec parameter in a web or CI service) c…
- Affected
- GitPython (pip) >= 3.1.30, < 3.2.0
- Fix
- Upgrade GitPython to 3.2.0 or later.
- Exploitation
- Public proof of concept
Story map
At a glance
gitpython: Amber, patch this week. Repo.__init__ decides which directory is the git directory by testing candidate paths in an order that considers the real .git last. Two earlier tests can be satisfied by ordinary tracked files. Git reserves only the literal name .git, so HEAD, objects/, refs/, config, gitdir, commondir and hooks/ at a repository root…
The flaws
- GHSA-f9j4-qggq-h239: GitPython Remote.pull() refspec bypasses the --upload-pack unsafe-option guard, enabling arbitrary command execution (CVSS 8.1)
- CVE-2026-87817: GitPython: Repository content can impersonate the git directory, leading to arbitrary code execution (CVSS 8.8 · EPSS 0%)
- CVE-2026-114145: GitPython validates a submodule's ".git" path only after cloning into it (RCE) (CVSS 7.5 · EPSS 0%)
- CVE-2026-87819: Denial of Service via catastrophic backtracking (ReDoS) in Actor.name_email_regex — commit author/committer field parsing (CVSS 7.5 · EPSS 1%)
The fix
Upgrade gitpython: 3.2.1 or later on your release line
Who is exposed: gitpython (pip) <= 3.1.59
Where it stands
- Public proof of concept
Connects to
- Same weakness: OS command injection (CWE-78). 331 other warnings in 30 days
Why it is Amber
- CVSS 8.1 high
- Public exploit or proof of concept referenced
- Remotely exploitable without logging in
- On your watchlist: PyPI
Affected packages
| Package | Ecosystem | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| GitPython | pip | >= 3.1.30, < 3.2.0 | 3.2.0 |
References
- https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-f9j4-qggq-h239
- https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython/security/advisories/GHSA-f9j4-qggq-h239
- https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython/pull/2247
- https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython/commit/790bb3164948625ffb043d2a162425d55923fe9a
- https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython/releases/tag/3.2.0
- https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-f9j4-qggq-h239
Original description
## Summary `Remote.pull()` in GitPython forwards its positional `refspec` argument directly to the `git pull` child process while its unsafe-option guard inspects only keyword arguments. An application that passes attacker-influenced data as the `refspec` (for example a user-supplied branch or refspec parameter in a web or CI service) can supply an option-shaped value such as `--upload-pack=<command>`. The value bypasses the `unsafe_git_pull_options` check, is placed after the `--` separator on the `git pull` command line, and is executed as the upload-pack program for local-path or SSH transports. This yields arbitrary command execution with the privileges of the calling process using the documented default arguments (`allow_unsafe_options=False`). ## Root Cause `Remote.pull()` is documented to reject dangerous options unless `allow_unsafe_options=True`, and `--upload-pack` is explicitly listed as such an option. The guard, however, only screens keyword arguments and never the positional `refspec`. The check builds its candidate list with `Git._option_candidates([], kwargs)`, passing an empty list in place of the positionals, so the `refspec` value is never compared against `unsafe_git_pull_options = ["--upload-pack"]`. The normalized `refspec` is then forwarded verbatim to the `git pull` invocation. The leading `--` separator that neutralizes an option-shaped refspec for `git fetch` and `git push` does not protect `git pull`, because `git pull` re-forwards its trailing positionals to an internal `git fetch` without re-inserting a `--` separator, so the positional becomes an option to that internal fetch. ```text Affected function: git.remote.Remote.pull Source: git/remote.py (guard at the check_unsafe_options call using _option_candidates([], kwargs); sink at the self.repo.git.pull("--", self, refspec, ...) invocation) ``` ## Impact An attacker who controls the `refspec` value passed to `Remote.pull()` achieves arbitrary operating-system command execution as the process invoking GitPython, with no additional privileges and no user interaction, on the default code path. Exploitation requires that the pulled remote uses a transport that runs upload-pack on the local side, namely a local filesystem path or SSH; over HTTPS the `--upload-pack` value is inert because the server ignores a client-supplied upload-pack program. This transport requirement narrows the population of vulnerable deployments but does not add work for the attacker once a vulnerable target is reached. Working checkouts commonly use local-path or SSH origins, so the exposed population is substantial. ## Proof of Concept ```text Environment: GitPython from the affected source tree; system git 2.43.0. The pulled origin uses a local filesystem transport (protocol.file.allow=always for git >= 2.38). ``` Reproduction steps: 1. Create an origin repository reachable over a local-path transport. 2. In a consumer repository, register that origin and call `Remote.pull()` with an attacker-controlled refspec. 3. Observe that the injected command executes. ```python import git repo = git.Repo("consumer") # has an origin using a local-path or ssh transport origin = repo.remote("origin") # Attacker-controlled refspec value; default arguments (allow_unsafe_options=False): origin.pull(refspec="--upload-pack=touch /tmp/pwned; git-upload-pack") ``` ```text cmdline: git pull -v -- origin --upload-pack=touch /tmp/pwned; git-upload-pack [attack] marker created (RCE) : True [isolate] upload_pack passed as KWARG blocked : True (only the positional refspec escapes) [sibling] same value via git fetch : safe (pull-specific behavior) [control] benign refspec : safe ``` ## Attack Chain 1. **Exposure:** An application calls `Remote.pull(refspec=<value>)` on the default path, where `<value>` is derived from attacker-influenced input such as a branch or refspec request parameter. 2. **Control:** The attacker supplies the string `--upload-pack=<command>; git-upload-pack`. The value passes through `Git._unpack_args`, which only flattens and stringifies it, preserving the option shape. 3. **Path:** The protocol loop calls `Git.check_unsafe_protocols` on the value, which only matches remote-helper transport URLs (a `<transport>::` form) and does not flag an `--upload-pack=` token. 4. **Guard:** The unsafe-option guard calls `check_unsafe_options(options=Git._option_candidates([], kwargs), ...)`. Because positionals are passed as an empty list, the positional `refspec` is never inspected against `unsafe_git_pull_options`. 5. **Primitive:** The value is forwarded to `git pull -v -- <remote> --upload-pack=<command>; git-upload-pack`; `git pull` re-forwards the positional to an internal `git fetch` without a `--` separator, so it is honored as the upload-pack program. 6. **Result:** For a local-path or SSH transport, git executes `<command>` as the upload-pack program, giving arbitrary command execution as the calling process user. ## Bypass Evidence The relevant guard is `Remote.pull()`'s own `check_unsafe_options` call, present in the current released artifact. It is incomplete: it inspects `Git._option_candidates([], kwargs)`, which only considers keyword arguments, so the positional `refspec` is never checked. This was confirmed empirically: passing the identical value as the `upload_pack=` keyword argument raises `UnsafeOptionError`, while passing it as the positional `refspec` does not, proving that only the positional escapes the guard. The `--` separator on the `git pull` command line was tested as a possible mitigation and refuted: with system git 2.43.0, `git pull -- <remote> '--upload-pack=<cmd>'` executed the injected command, while the identical value supplied to `git fetch -- ...` and `git push -- ...` did not execute, because those subcommands honor the `--` terminator whereas `git pull` re-forwards positionals to an internal fetch without one. The `check_unsafe_protocols` transport
Last activity 27 Oct 2026. Patch Forecast updates every hour.